There has been no increase in the numbers of opportunities available to this class of people whom we call doctors. May be I am keeping my foot on one more debatable topic.!!!! They will soon learn what others already know: Let me give a first hand description of this, although in brief.
A A What doctors wished their patients knew Surprising results from our survey of primary-care physicians Last updated: The site you're on now, reviews impartial evidence and takes no advertising but some of its content is available only to paying subscribers. Now let me stir the pot a bit more.
Medical colleges operating out of rented premises, lacking basic infrastructure. Observing the serious condition of the patient, he was instantaneously recommended to a better equipped private hospital.
I have witnessed many such incidents, and feel that even if there was negligence, the Consumer Protection Courts are available to redress any complaint. That is being unfair.
Anyways the point I want to bring out strongly is that: Hospitals are sending patients home with long lists of self-care chores. As in lawyers — they should be debarred from practising medicine if found guilty. But I wish that we do not neglect this issue in totality and that too for two reasons.
Our survey found that patients with those conditions were significantly more likely to complain about ineffective treatments.
This story is another reason why I did not blame only private hospitals and private doctors of illegal bunglings, because that would have shielded all government employed doctors. Are you sure that you want to delete this answer? Drug and lifestyle regimens allow those with chronic conditions to live longer, healthier lives but can be difficult to manage or, in some cases, for patients to afford.
Not knowing much up front about a doctor's personality or treatment style was a real obstacle for patients in search of a good match. There has been no increase in the numbers of opportunities available to this class of people whom we call doctors.
Unfortunately, he breathed his last on the way. Four days later, she was diagnosed with stomach cancer.
I blame this situation on the society as a whole and government policies in particular. So lets first establish the fact that you are biased- right or wrong???
Patients who gave their doctors high marks for "professionalism" were more likely to be highly satisfied. Armed with two death certificates issued on two different dates, the family published the horror story in media channels.
That is why there are more and more instances of public outrage. Despite our best efforts he died. But I wish that we do not neglect this issue in totality and that too for two reasons. This guy had been out drinking, and made such a tamasha, threatening to kill the doctors, screaming abuse etc.
The Supreme Court's judgment classifies doctors and hospitals into three categories--those who charge all patients, those who charge some patients and offer free services to.
Responding to appeals by doctors against earlier judgments by state high courts, the Supreme Court ruled that patients aggrieved by deficiencies in medical services rendered for payment can claim damages Should doctors be tried in consumer courts?
This issue requires much debate, a lot of questioning, also a lot of introspection. - Doctors practicing honestly and ethically should not be tried in consumer court.
Doctors are life saviors and like any other professionals who provide their services to the society. They need to be loyal to their profession as well as honest to their customers. Jan 20, · Best Answer: Presently only private practitioners are within the purview of the Consumer Act because they take money from their patients for the librariavagalume.com taking the fee, a practitioner is liable to deliver the fair librariavagalume.com: Resolved.
- A doctor is a human being and is bound to make mistakes. - For mistakes which he has not made knowingly, he cannot be tried in consumer court. - Doctors always try to .Download